Democrats and Republicans
WHY THE DIVISION?
Some say it is a one party system with two wings.
It is not really that simple. It's true that both have been "bought off" in many ways by many of the same people. Sometimes as an "insurance policy" so that whoever gets into power the "financier" is taken care of.
Even more sinister is that globalists such as the Trilateral Commission, headed by David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski have hand picked and/or approved every major Presidential Candidate on both sides since Ford. Some will say that we need both parties to give us the illusion of choice while ensuring national disunity. And there is some truth to that.
The very very interesting thing is it just takes one of the two parties or "political ends" to stir up hatred. "Democrat" and "Republican" can be substituted for "Liberal" and "Conservative".
While they both criticize each other, only one group stirs up hatred.
People use Political terms without thought. For example, when you call someone a Conservative, that term is absolutely meaningless unless you know what it is they are conserving. In the United States then, a Conservative is one who honors and supports the Constitutional Republic. Hence the term Republican. Sometimes that applies to Libertarians also.
A democrat on the other hand calls him/herself that because they seek a pure Democracy.
In that Democracy, the sheep is done for. It will either have to eat meat, or it will be the dinner.
In a Constitutional Republic, however, the sheep is protected, because there are checks and balances to ensure the sheep’s rights and safety. This is because while the prime goal of a Democracy is Majority rule, the prime goal of a Constitutional Republic is the freedom, sanctity and rights of every human being.
And this is why the party that was of the KKK, Slavery, Lynching and other inhuman things called themselves the Democratic Party. In that system the minorities—in this case Black people— had no and would have no chance and would have no rights. The majority could vote to keep them in slavery, and there would be nothing the Black People could do to protect themselves.
Likewise the reason the party that was founded on the platform of the abolishment of slavery called themselves the Republican Party, is that in a Constitutional Republic the Slave is freed. Many black people were involved in the formation of the Republican party. After the Emancipation Proclamation by a Republican President the Democrats of course fought tooth and nail to maintain a division between whites and blacks, and they fought against the Civil Rights Movement.
At some point, it is said, that the Bad Guys became the Good Guys and simultaneously (and fantastically), the Good Guys became the Bad Guys. It seems very far fetched. But did that happen?
On the surface one might come to that conclusion. However when I joined that Democrat Party "group" years ago I did it because they advertise themselves as being the party of equality, regardless of Race, Gender, Sexual orientation, Religion etc. which I support. however there was always a culture of hatred in that party. The "others"--it was implied or overtly stated, were misogynist, Racist, Bigoted and Warmongering Fascists.
Moreover I noticed that my conservative friends were not those things---and they did not return the hatred. There is a self perpetuating echo chamber culture in the Democrat Party party where the understanding is that "We are the good guys and those guys over there are bad" And it is the Democrats that constantly bring up the topic of Race, focusing primarily on the notion that the Blacks and other minorities are victims while the “bad White people” are the perpetrators. Black on Black crime is ignored, Black on White crime is ignored, and White on Black crime is highlighted and broadcast.
First of all empowering victimhood in blacks actually disempowers them as human beings. And demonizing White people as the "oppressors" creates fear, which also leads to hatred. This fosters Racial division which is evil. Actually Fomenting Racial division by constantly bringing it up, making everything about it, is worse than being a racist. While it is important to call it out when it is clearly present, calling it out where it clearly isn't is evil.
Recently in Cincinnati a few white people were knocked down by a couple of Black people. while on the ground many black people then went in and kicked them and stomped on them. Why so much hatred/ That incident is a fruit of the Democrat party which has been teaching Blacks and other "minorities" to hate white people. And of course the biased media hardly touched that incident.
You see, Blacks and "Minorities" are still being attacked by Democrats, except in a more covert and far more sinister way.
One example: a Black lady on a video shared that her young adult son wanted to get a job and make something of his life. She forbade him. Why? It's because if he got her job she would lose her Section Eight Benefits......! Now who would orchestrate a scenario where Black people are incentivized not to move forward and upward? Not the conservatives. Furthermore black families are incentivized by Liberals to have broken families and fatherless homes by giving them more money if their family is broken. What happens when families break? Crime goes up.
And that's the goal.
Here is another example of "Inverse" Bigotry: When I announced to a few friends that we were going to visit our Grandson in Georgia, my Democrat friends said that Atlanta was good since it is Democrat, but to avoid The "red" areas. Those people over there they told me, are crazy racist and misogynist types. Our Grandson was in Augusta. We first visited Atlanta. There were nice areas, and there were the run down areas, like Los Angeles. I got reports of great racial tension in some areas, some of it very serious. Those areas (and the nicer areas) were Democrat. We went to Augusta, and we visited the surrounding towns and there was no such tension. All ethnic groups dressed alike and there was more racial harmony there than anywhere I had ever been in the United States! And people did not talk about it because it wasn't an issue--at least in the places we visited. We did business with a black owned business and we were treated like old friends. In fact all people of all ethnic groups were much friendlier than in "Blue" Los Angeles.
It was the same in Mississippi where we also visited extensively. One popular dining place was called Pearl's Diner and they served soul food. Equal parts white and black. No tension at all. The owner's son visited our table and we talked about his travels. He escaped from Los Angeles to Mississippi because there was so much anger in LA he said. Anger, resentment (and the tension I mentioned) ....and this place here in Mississippi was a relief.
So what's going on? Why do the Blue states (that we visited) have (a lot) more racial tension than the Red states?
When I got back to LA and talked to a neighbor about our travels he went on a loud tirade about those Racist misogynist bigoted red necks down there.
And yet that Democrat neighbor is the only bigot I had met in the last month or so. And there was nothing I could say to him, his mind was set (a very familiar phenomenon with Democrats). His hatred for those people he had never met I found typical of a Democrat. Bigotry disguised as a hatred of bigotry.
A very interesting psychological twist.
But there was something that I found far more concerning than Race-baiting and Gender baiting. One group genuinely despises this Constitutional Republic. They have enjoyed the fruits of that Republic growing up (What remains of it) but want to obliterate it altogether in favor of a system or systems that do not honor the rights freedoms and sanctity of each individual. Why is this? First let's talk about a particular Buddhist Leader.
I refer to a Lay spiritual Buddhist Leader and mentor to many, Daisaku Ikeda who wrote a poem entitled "Sun of Jiyu over a New Land", in which he called the United States the Land of his Dreams. Little did he know that many of his followers had learned to actually despise the Constitutional Republic known as the United States. Some began fighting for a "Pure Democracy", a society the Founding Fathers avoided because minority voters would have no rights in such a society. The founders instead wanted a society whose prime goal was the freedom, rights and sanctity of every citizen, hence the Constitutional Republic (Still with a Democratic process). As I have said, majority rule, which is the goal of a pure Democracy always tramples on the lives and rights of the minority voters. Other "Left Wingers" wanted Socialism or Communism, two political ideologies that killed between One Hundred and Two Hundred million people in just the last century, through sometimes unspeakably cruel means.
The Million Dollar question then is, why would anyone trade Freedom and the sanctity of life for an unspeakably cruel, murderous and totalitarian State?
For centuries humanity has been fighting to climb out of the darkness into an enlightenment, when suddenly a whole group of people want to plunge into a darkness deeper than any depravity we have ever experienced as a species. Many of them are from the country that was founded on the pinnacle of enlightenment. Why would they want this? Easy.
Elites foment resentment in the population for what they don't have. They foment jealousy. (Tax the Rich) Shamefully this is easy to do. Focus on the negative side of history of the United States and ignore the positive side. Almost every country at some point had slaves. Some of the Founding Fathers owned slaves. It was actually normal back then. Teach people to hate and resent the Founding Fathers. Hatred is the greatest tool for human manipulation, because people love to hate (ask the victims of the Holocaust). And people love to resent. It matters not that Thomas Jefferson, for example wrote an abolishment of slavery into the Declaration of Independence but two States rejected it so it was excluded. It does not matter that a few states were slave free because of Jefferson. It does not matter that it was Jefferson that abolished the North Atlantic Slave Trade. That must have been unimaginably difficult. Nor does it matter that every argument Lincoln made for the abolishment of slavery were citations of Jefferson. Ignore all of that. Focus only on the negative. Demonize him.
So the Lefties tear down statues of the Founding Fathers and erect a statue of Lenin.
Vyacheslav Molotov worked closely with Stalin and Lenin. He said "Compared to Lenin, Stalin was a mere lamb".
The unimaginable cruelty Lenin visited on his people was unprecedented in human history up to that time.
Lenin's work: Russian Communist Gulag. Some of these are children.
Communist Gulag. Why would students of Ikeda vote and campaign for such inhuman cruelty?
Why champion such unimaginable depravity? it is actually very simple. Nichiren Buddhists in the United States have never fully embraced the teachings. They were taught by the corrupt priests through Mr. Williams that being a true practitioner meant obedience to the leadership. Even if the leaders (and priests) said things that contradicted the teachings.
Which continues as of this writing. And when a group of people blindly follows leaders who are not connected to the teachings and the Mentor, they themselves also become enemies of the teaching. Which is why, remarkably, they can not tell the difference between good and evil. This is because they are easily manipulated and have no wisdom. Which is the actual proof of having distorted the teaching by refusing to protect it.
At the beginning of that split the Lay organization in the United States had 84,000 districts for discussion and other activities. Thirty five years later they have less than 2,500. But the worst thing is that the members are completely oblivious to this.
The Democrats reject all the above. Daisaku Ikeda's dream of "The Second American Renaissance" is not on their bucket list. What they seek is something in quite another direction:
They want to flood the country with millions of unvetted people. It does not matter that a Democrat President (of "colour") deported over five million illegal immigrants. It's ok if he does it but not ok if a Republican does it. keep the people from many countries flooding through open borders by the millions. This leads to unbelievable instability and homelessness and many of these people do not want to assimilate. Especially those of certain radical religious groups. Crime goes way up, including Drug Trafficking and Child Trafficking. Which brings in excuses for great government intervention and enforcement.
Hate the one President who is trying to bring the country back to prosperity. These Democrats hate him and his supporters more than they have ever hated anyone.
You see that hatred was always there. Long, long before that most hated president showed up. I lived with that hatred. He just provided a perfect target for their hatred and violence. And there was violence.
These were called peaceful by CNN an MSNBC and other media outlets....
....riots that cost Billions of dollars in damage to property and business, ruining many lives...
....and costing the lives of between 35 and 100+ people, all that killing and destruction justified by the killing of one man...and the people responsible have not been brought to justice and people still praise these groups for this evil and despicable act.
Many of Ikeda's "followers" support this type of action. Some will deny that. But they have not spoken out against it. At many meetings the very people involved in the destruction and killing have been praised. Why have these students of Ikeda continuously voiced their support for the people who murder and inflict violence?
And what happens when some people (Conservatives and others) do not want millions of unvetted people pouring into the country by the tens of millions?
More peaceful protests. All by the Liberals. The peaceful tolerant Liberals
All this violence is by Democrats and Liberals. No Conservatives.
All the while pointing fingers at Conservatives and MAGA and calling them violent....
With no accountability, no self reflection. At all. This is the party of tolerance and peace. Not only is it a complete lie, their murderous hateful violence echoes the hateful and murderous political ideologies they support. Scroll back to the images of the Gulags. Those images are mild. They invent terms such as "Right Wing Dictator", but Socialism is Left wing. Mussolini was a Marxist. Fascism is a form of Socialism--Corporate Socialism. The Nazis were National Socialist. That is what Nazi means. Redefining Socialism to mean something other than what it is so the Nazis do not fit is profoundly dishonest.
These were Left wing Dictators. And just like the Democrats in this country, Hateful, murderous and violent.
All the while lying about everything.
The riots above, the destruction of billions of dollars in property and business, the killing of between 35 and over 100 people were over the death of one man. A convicted felon. When a conservative is murdered what do Conservatives do? Do they riot and burn down whole city blocks across the country? No, they hold a prayer vigil. Charlie Kirk, NOT a convicted felon, who peaceably dialogued with the opposition and was more respectful to them than they were to him, was murdered in front of his family.
And what did the liberals do? they made countless celebrating his death, dancing and singing "Celebrate good times"... "His neck turned into a fountain! His neck turned into a fountain!" In what has to be the purest and most naked display of human evil I have ever seen.
Just those two things define what the Conservatives are and what the Liberals are.very well.
Eight years of unbroken war. Not a peep or complaint from Democrats and Liberals. The fewest days of peace from any Presidency--and yet his successor who did not have a war is the "Warmongering Hitler".
Trump did not do this or anything remotely this evil. And yet the Liberals are so unbelievably arrogant that the one president they hate more than any other President--or even any other human-is the one that had no war in his first term, and now in the second term had one precise strike against the brutal murderous drug trafficking dictator of Venezuela who was so vicious and cruel 20, 000,000 people fled that country--and removed him with minimum casualties. The Liberals? "PUT HIM BACK!!!!!"
Precision strikes in Iran, doing everything they can to avoid citizen casualties to remove an even worse regime which not only preyed on its own people for forty seven years, they were the number one sponsor of terror in the world. Over 87,000 terror attacks since 2000. The people pleaded to be liberated from that evil occupation (IRGC is NOT Iranian) and the Liberals scream again. Put back the murderous regime!!
Did they protest Obama's seven wars? Hundreds of thousands of innocents killed? No. And why would they? They do not care about human life. At all. They are not compassionate, they are self righteous.
Here is another example of what Liberals do: take a man who as a college student supported the Black Panther Party. Who later won an award for hiring the most minorities, and later another award for doing many things for the Black Community. A man who donated more money to black colleges and universities than any private citizen. Then when he runs for office he is called (By the Liberals) a racist, Bigot, Misogynist Fascist.
And even with overwhelming evidence that he's not a racist--none of that matters to the Liberals.
There is a level of hatred with Liberals that is so intense, an arrogance so pervasive and impenetrable that no evidence nor even proof of their own violence and their finger pointing at people innocent of their accusations makes any difference.
Trump supporters being attacked. Some were even killed. I never saw a Trump supporter initiate violence. ALL the violence was initiated by Liberals.
A violent Liberal Antifa mob.
Another Trump Supporter beaten bloody. Zero self reflection, zero accountability.
All Trump supporters beaten by the "Peaceful" Liberals. January 6, it will be shown, was also orchestrated by these violent hateful Liberals. But no matter what evidence comes out the Liberals will never accept it. And you will not see liberals beaten by Trumps supporters in this way.
Trump, when in office released 5,000 Black men unjustly incarcerated under the previous administration; who created Opportunity Zones in Minority neighborhoods so those people could start businesses; who had hundreds of Black people come to the White House to pray with him because of all the hatred. but is still a racist. And the Liberals call him a warmongering Hitler, when he himself had no war first term but his predecessor had seven wars. This "Hitler" also had the Abraham Peace Accord, the greatest step toward peace in the Middle East in seventy five years. All of this being the opposite of a Hitler, yes?
The "Racist" Trump praying with Black people at the white house.
Why would Liberals--or anyone--call him things he is clearly not? In fact when he does the opposite of the things for which he is accused? As you can see from what I have said this is a familiar pattern of decades old Liberal hatred.
And there's the rub. You see that man was not hated for being a racist and a warmonger, he was really hated by the Democrats and Liberals because he was not those things.
How am I so certain? Nobody protested Obama's seven wars, not even those who (rightly) protested Bush's three wars. The tens of thousands of bombs dropped by Obama on innocent civilians in 2016 alone meant absolutely nothing to the Democrats and Liberals. When these Liberals were protesting they were not protesting a war, they were protesting the President they did not like.
The goal of the Democratic Party has always been to foment hatred and racism. The hatred was always there when I was in that party and was surrounded by it. What makes that party truly evil is that is pretends to be the opposite.
The Democrats want racism and division. They always have. They tried it the direct way with slavery and KKK but that works not so well today, so they do it more deceptively. And like a truly, truly evil organization they bring as many well meaning people on board.
As I said Black people are being attacked, still by the Democrats, as of old, but this time on a psychological level and through very devious and sinister means. It is similar to Iago, who was a Shakespearean character. One of the most, perhaps the most sinister of Shakespeare’s villains, he would befriend (or pretend to befriend) Othello and others and bring about their ruin through lies and deception. He made Othello think his beloved wife was having an affair. Iago fomented the hatred of Othello for an innocent woman which culminated in Othello strangling her, his own wife, then in taking his own life.
This principle should be very familiar to anyone who has the objectivity and any integrity to actually see what is actually happening in the political field today.
The question then that arises, is how are the leaders of the Democratic Party able to acquire so many “Well intentioned” people, many of whom are individuals of genuine compassion? Once the Narrative is controlled, the rest is easy. Frighteningly easy. Every human being has a Base Ego. Western culture has one type of understanding of this. The Japanese, especially certain Japanese Buddhists have the best understanding I have come across. The word they give to this “Ego” is Asura. Asura is illustrated often by fiery demons. Some westerners called it the “World of Anger”, and although rage and anger can come of it, it is more fundamental than that. Some other Westerners tried to relabel it as Arrogance, but that is also shallow. Again arrogance comes from that condition but the Base Ego might be described as the lowest state of human consciousness where there is a sense of “Self” and a sense of “Other”.
And people in general do love to hate. We think for some unfathomable reason that we are inherently different from those insanely hateful people who engaged in the Holocaust and other hateful human atrocities. We are not.
We are not.
The irony gets deeper.
A comment by an Iranian woman residing in England having visited the United States.
The party who is "against war and pro peace" loves the President who had the fewest days of peace and hates the president who in first term had no war.
These Leftists are overwhelmingly pro Hamas and Anti Israel. Now while the actions of the leaders of Israel are certainly not beyond reproach, what is most interesting is that Israel would support Liberal citizens within their borders (providing the Liberals do not engage in violent destructive and murderous riots as they did in the U.S. in 2020). That is, the Israelis would treat the women fairly, they would treat other religions fairly, they would treat gays and Lesbians fairly, but Hamas and other radical Islamists would torture and murder all “infidels” and “deviants” and treat women as property. A woman can be stoned to death for the crime of being raped. Furthermore in the Iran conflict the Liberals and Leftists overwhelmingly support the cruel and violent Islamic Republic oppressors against the Iranian people who want peace and freedom. In this case people who call themselves “Liberals” support a totalitarian, cruel, murderous and intolerant group of people over those who are more “Liberal” and tolerant. As usual.
Huh? This is no joke.
And who opposes the above? Bringing back Liberty to Iranians? The Democrats and the Liberals of course.
If we go back to the notion that many Leftists support Socialism, Communism and Marxism, we have a similar conundrum. Leftists and Liberals have for years portrayed Socialism and Communism as being “for the people”. So why is it that these “For the people” ideologies were responsible for the deaths of between one hundred and two hundred million people in just the last century? How is that an example of being “for the people”? In just four years the “People’s Republic of China” under Mao murdered between forty and possibly as high as a hundred million people (1958-1962). People tend to report the conservative number which still must be a historical murder record. And the fact that we do not know by tens of millions of people how many were actually killed indicates the absolute horror of it. They claim Mussolini the Fascist Dictator was “Right wing”, and that Marxism is “Left Wing”…..when Mussolini was a Marxist to the day he died, and when the Fascist party got into power they got a letter of congratulations from Lenin who recognized a fellow Marxist “Revolutionary”. Do Liberals and Leftists not know this? Or are they themselves (as they have been historically) just unspeakably cruel and arrogant?
They point fingers at the man who had the Abraham Peace Accord, No war in his first term, is negotiating peace between Ukraine and Russia (Their Leftist political heroes actually started) and call him a warmongering Hitler and a Nazi. Now Nazi stands for National Socialist German Worker’s Party. Of course the Leftists claim Hitler was not a true Socialist (a Leftist ideology) and redefine the term Socialism in order to distance themselves from this unspeakably cruel system.
What about other “Communist” or Socialist regimes? Well there was Cambodia and the Killing fields, There was East Germany, Bulgaria, and the “Democratic People’s Republic of Korea”, Viet Nam and Ethiopia, Hungary, and so on…there was never a successful Communist State. All totalitarian and cruel. Cuba came closest to being “reasonable”, but Cuba—who got significant amounts of money from Russia (financed by Rockefeller, the banks and Wallstreet) although still totalitarian, is an exception to the norm as the cruelty level is lower.
The question then is how do the Leftists justify their love for political ideologies that have, one might argue, the very worst cruelty and murder record of all Political systems and ideologies in world history? It is not difficult to figure.
One tactic Leftists use is to point to countries that are NOT Socialist (Scandinavian, for example) CALL them Socialist and say “look how good they are”. Online, there are many definitions of Socialism, most of which make no sense upon actual examination. For example, one definition (Noam Chomsky’s) claims that it is a political ideology where the workers own the means of production. Has that ever happened? The only time that has ever worked at all is in a company where the workers are significantly involved in the creation process and that's a small fraction of industry. It can not work across an entire country. They tried it with the farms in the Soviet Union which was an absolute disaster since there was no leadership and therefore no set direction and furthermore no accountability for the workers as they had no oversight. Millions starved as a result. All that under an evil dictatorship. Which means if you tried a different method that worked you’d be forced back to the other method. Another definition of Socialism states that it is a system where the citizens of a nation own the resources of that nation. Which would mean that in this country 350 million people would own each resource. Is that even possible? Well of course it isn’t, it is utter nonsense. So I decided to think it through for myself, and it is actually very simple. In politics “Social” means Government control. Social Medicine and Social Education mean government controlled Medicine and Education. Therefore Socialism itself is a government controlled society.
Which is the very definition of totalitarianism. So suddenly it all makes sense. The Nazis (Who the Leftists claim were NOT Socialist) were totalitarian. It fits. Mussolini being a Marxist suddenly fits. They were ALL left wing. The Left refuse to acknowledge this because of ego. The spoken (And unspoken) narrative is and has always been “We are the GOOD guys, Those other people are not”. Furthermore because of the Leftists’ arrogance they refuse to see it. That very refusal is what sets them down that dark path.
And they won’t dialogue with the opposition. They generally refuse. Respectful dialogue with the opposition is the path to peace. As I have said, the Left claims to support peace but actually rejects it at the most fundamental level. They engage in hatred and violence and a support for both. They do not denounce the riots that destroyed billions in property and business, destroying countless lives and killing over 35 people (maybe a hundred or more). Why? Because they support this evil. They scream January 6 insurrection which was very mild by comparison and show their—is it profound lack of intelligence or ego?—when it is clear upon investigation that it was orchestrated by Trump haters NOT Trump supporters as a way to discourage them. Trump offered National Guard Protection for that day and both Nancy Pelosi and Muriel Bowser are on record as having refused that.
But it matters not, right?
If you ever had any doubt as to what evil looks like, well this is just the tip of the iceberg.
A tiny tiny tip.
And those people who refuse to wake up and at least begin to ask questions, at some point can no longer be called good.
Comments
Post a Comment